Aquilino Ribeiro, enligt Bottelho. Detalj

Aquilino Ribeiro - en glömd författare

Att den portugisiska prosan tillhör världens främsta är väl knappast ett kontroversiellt påstående. Få länder har så många författare av nobelprisklass. Antonio Lobo Antunes med sin stundtals heidlöst formexperimentella stil ...

Av: Jesper Nordström | 24 november, 2015
Litteraturens porträtt

Helena Leijd, Dikter

  Fågelgudinnan   Vindarna sjunger mitt namn Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn   Jag   Fågelgudinnan,   som föddes ur det heliga ägget   Det som gudarna försökte trampa sönder   Reser mig igen

Av: Helena Leijd | 05 juli, 2010
Utopiska geografier

Argentinska Resebrev - I.

  Körledaren som vänder sig lite stelt mot publiken i universitets vackra aula är iförd en elegant kostym. Vi är inte många i de branta läktarna. Några av de manliga körmedlemmarnas ...

Av: Axel Andersson | 04 december, 2010
Resereportage

Hur påverkades Ingmar Bergman av August Strindberg?

År 1986 fick Ingmar Bergman stora problem med en uppsättning av August Strindbergs Ett Drömspel. Sjuka skådespelare och annat elände försvårade repetitionerna. Makterna tog över, tyckte han. Den där djävla ...

Av: Kurt Bäckström | 28 mars, 2012
Essäer om film

Rodolfo Kusch

The Myth of the "Pueblo": Francis Reveals Who Told It To Him



That he went to a Jewish psychoanalyst for six months is not the only brand-new revelation made by Pope Francis to his interviewer, Dominique Wolton, in the book issued in France a few weeks ago. 
For Kusch, the first of the two visions, the Eurocentric one, is intolerant and incapable of understanding the second, which he instead wanted to accentuate and to which he dedicated his most important studies. For this reason too he found himself at the margins of the culture of the dominant elites and instead found an admirer in Bergoglio.

On Kusch’s thought it could be useful to read the article by Cecilia Fiel published in “El Clarín” in 2012 on the occasion of a posthumous honor awarded to him, and a 2010 essay by Alberto Julián Pérez in the Argentine magazine "Mitológicas.”

Halfway through the first chapter, Jorge Mario Bergoglio also gives for the first time the name of the anthropologist who inspired his conception of “people”:

“There is a thinker that you should read: Rodolfo Kusch, a German who lived in northwestern Argentina, an excellent philosopher and anthropologist. He made one thing clear: that the word ‘people’ is not a logical word. It is a mythical word. It is not possible to speak of people logically, because that would mean making only a description. In order to understand a people, to understand what are the values of this people, one must enter into the spirit, into the heart, into the work, into the history, and into the myth of its tradition. This point is truly at the basis of the theology called ‘of the people.’ That is to say, to go with the people, see how it expresses itself. This distinction is important. The people is not a logical category, it is a mythical category.”

And a few pages later, Francis comes back to the subject to scold “L'Osservatore Romano” for having distorted his thought:

“I have said and have repeated: the word ‘people’ is not a logical concept, it is a mythical concept. Not mystical, but mythical. [. . .] I once said ‘mythical’ and L’Osservatore Romano involuntarily erred in the translation, speaking of ‘mystical people’. And do you know why? Because they did not understand what mythical people means. They said to themselves: No it is the pope who made a mistake, let’s put ‘mystical’.”

Stöd Tidningen Kulturen

Köp en prenumeration! Klicka för mer information.

In effect, that’s precisely what happened. On the way back from the journey to Mexico, during the usual in-flight press conference, on February 7, 2016 Francis said precisely - speaking in Italian - that “the word ‘people’ is not a logical category, it is a mythical category.”

The video of the press conference, which is still available, is irrefutable proof of this. At the 52:29 mark, the word that comes from the pope’s mouth is “mythical” and not “mystical.”

The next day, however, “L'Osservatore Romano” changed the word to “mystical.” And the same thing happened with the official transcription of the press conference in multiple languages, the one that can still be read today on the Vatican website.

Francis quickly found out about the word change. And in an interview the following July 6 with the trusty Antonio Spadaro, director of “La Civiltà Cattolica” - an interview that ended up in a volume with the homilies and discourses of Bergoglio from when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires, published that same summer - he did all he could to put things back into place:

“There is a word that is very mistreated: there is so much talk about populism, about populist politics, about populist platforms. But this is a mistake. People is not a logical category, nor is it a mystical category, if we understand it in the sense that everything the people does is good or in the sense that the people is an angelic category. No! It is a mythical category, if anything. I repeat: mythical. People is an historical and mythical category. The people is made in a process, with the sights set on a common objective and project. History is built by this process of generations that succeed each other within a people. It takes a myth to understand the people.

When you explain what a people is, you use logical categories because you have to explain it: they are needed, of course. But you do not explain in this way the meaning of belonging to the people. The word people has something more that cannot be explained in a logical manner. Being part of the people is being part of a shared identity made of social and cultural bonds. And this is not an automatic thing, on the contrary: it is a slow, difficult process toward a shared project.”

Curiously, “L'Osservatore Romano” - on November 11, 2016, in presenting the book with the homilies and discourses of Bergoglio - reproduced this clarification in its entirety, perhaps without realizing that it had been the cause of it.

But even those who manage the official publication of the pope’s texts did not bat an eye, leaving the word “mystical” in place of “mythical.”

And this brings us up to the book-length interview of this year with Dominique Wolton, in which Bergoglio lets loose.

Once again without anyone correcting the error, in the official collection of the pope’s discourses.

In any case, this “qui pro quo” has brought one benefit. It has given Pope Francis an opportunity to clarify further the meaning and roots of his populism. Where between “myth” and “mystique” the difference is not so great, as has been understood for some time:

Bergoglio, Politician. The Myth of the Chosen People

As for his inspiration, Rodolfo Kusch (1922-1979), it is interesting that the pope should have named him.

An author of both anthropological and theatrical works, Kusch took his inspiration from Heidegger’s philosophy to distinguish between “being” and “dwelling,” describing with the first category the rationalistic and domineering vision of Western man and with the second the vision of the indigenous Latin American peoples, in peace with nature and animated by none other than a “myth.”

For Kusch, the first of the two visions, the Eurocentric one, is intolerant and incapable of understanding the second, which he instead wanted to accentuate and to which he dedicated his most important studies. For this reason too he found himself at the margins of the culture of the dominant elites and instead found an admirer in Bergoglio.

On Kusch’s thought it could be useful to read the article by Cecilia Fiel published in “El Clarín” in 2012 on the occasion of a posthumous honor awarded to him, and a 2010 essay by Alberto Julián Pérez in the Argentine magazine "Mitológicas.”

 

Sandro Magister

Klicka här för att söka efter böcker hos Bokus apropå den här artikeln.
Varje köp via denna länk stödjer TK.

Ur arkivet

view_module reorder
Federico Garcia Lorca

80 år av desinformation om Lorcas död

Den 19 augusti var det 80 år sedan som den spanske poeten och dramatikern Federico Garcia Lorca mördades av falangisterna. I gryningen den 19 augusti 1936 förde de honom till ...

Av: Bo Gustavsson | Litteraturens porträtt | 03 Maj, 2017

Hölderlin

Polyfona kontexter – cirkulära texter

Fortsätter så min växelverkande resa med korta prosastycken, reflexioner, egna och andras dikter: allt för att visa hur det osökta, tillsynes slumpartade och kontextfria, ändå hänger ihop, måste hänga ihop ...

Av: Göran af Gröning | Utopiska geografier | 27 april, 2017

Litterära avgudar och charterturism

Litterära avgudar och charterturism Allt är inte guld som glimmar? Steven Ekholm skriver om den lönlösa jakten efter litterära reliker i bland annat Prousts Combray. Ett märkligt fenomen, även om det ...

Av: Steven Ekholm | Essäer om litteratur & böcker | 09 februari, 2011

En sväng med Mina

Med Tomas Cederkvist  som skeppare blir en sväng på Vättern lekande lätt. Hans godmodiga och trygga erfarenhetsbaserade hållning gör en eftermiddagstur norrut längs Omberg till en sann njutning. Kulturens Per-Inge Planefors ...

Av: Per-Inge Planefors | Gästkrönikör | 06 juli, 2013

Bland gruvor och gangsters. Intervju med Shangjou Cai

Shangjou Cai vann i år Silverlejonet i Venedig med filmen ”People Mountain People Sea”, ett verk som visar hur livlig och mångsidig den kinesiska filmindustrin är. Denne regissör gästade i ...

Av: Roberto Fogelberg Rota | Filmens porträtt | 22 december, 2011

Ljusets skugga. Del 1. Kroppens avsked

Den grekiske mästaren Parmenides påstår att alla former av tillblivelse och mångfald är illusion, och säger att Varats verklighet är oföränderlig, ofödd, sluten, evig, orubblig. Samma sak finner vi i ...

Av: Gilda Melodia | Utopiska geografier | 07 december, 2014

Cate Blanchett Foto: Popperipopp, Wikimedia commons. CC BY SA 3.0

Inför Oscarsgalan. Del 2: Carol

Ivo Holmqvists andra delen av essän inför Oscarsgalan 2016.

Av: Ivo Holmqvist | Essäer om film | 15 februari, 2016

Kroppen berövad själ och ande

Ting och ägodel Begreppet kropp, associeras i vår kultursfär dels till vår egen fysiska kropp, som på något sätt är levande, kroppslig. Dels till en kropp som varit levande men nu ...

Av: Oliver Parland | Övriga porträtt | 22 Maj, 2013

Botanisera i arkivet
close

Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev!

Få de senaste artiklarna direkt i din brevlåda - helt kostnadsfritt.

Du kan när som helst avsluta din prenumeration - enklast klickar du bara på länken du hittar i varje nyhetsbrev.